The Final Total TOE (theory of everything)

For a Final total TOE, it must consist of, at least, three pillars:

One, physics-TOE

Two, life-TOE

Three, math-TOE

It must arises from a single FIRST PRINCIPLE.

And, it must make contact to ALL known facts (not theories).

This criteria is simple enough and is verifiable by every street walking person.

Section one: the philosophy

Wigner (in a 1969 essay) argued that {“the enormous usefulness of mathematics in the natural sciences is something bordering on the mysterious”, and that “there is no rational explanation for it”.}

Wigner’s statement shows the current status of math which has a BASE totally disjoined from NATURE. The modern math INVENTed a set LANGUAGEs and plays a language game internally. Language by definition is recursively defined and is a machine for producing paradoxes and riddles.

Furthermore, the key point here is that the math-universe is a multiverse, with infinite many sub-universes while THIS physical universe is unique with many known attributes: nature constants, Planck CMB data, SM particle zoo, etc.

So, the key issue here is that:

One, is math ONLY as a great tool and language for describing physics? Or,

Two, {math universe} is totally isomorphic to the {physics universe}, the total universal structural realism.

Or, three, THIS unique physical universe of ours is just a happenstance in the physics-multiverse.

The answer from nature is {Two}, and this was the key point in the book {Super Unified Theory, US copyright TX 1-323-231} which describes this issue with three Chapters:

Chapter Seven – Colored numbers (page 53 – 61)

Chapter Eight – Chromology (page 62 – 69)

Chapter Nine – Unilogy (page 70 – 74)

Some of discussions of this issue were also post online over 20 years ago, see,

Unification of physics and mathematics, http://www.prequark.org/Mlaw.htm

and, Law of Creation, http://www.prequark.org/Create.htm

As the criteria is that all these three TOEs must arise from a single ‘First Principle’, there is no way to prove that the third TOE (math) is correct if we cannot show the details of two other TOEs. Thus, I will show the validity of math-TOE by showing the two other TOEs first.

Section two: physics-TOE

One, the first principle: {The essence of THIS universe is ‘NOTHINGNESS’, and it must remain to be nothingness}

Two, definition of ‘nothingness’: {timelessness and immutability}

Three, manifestation of timelessness: at every t, it must be ‘timelessness’ in essence.

Four, the equation of this ‘timelessness’: {Delta S = (i^n1, i^n2, i^n3) x C x Delta T} … Equation zero

S, space; T, time (real); C, light speed. (n1, n2, n3) take the value of {0, 1, 2, or 3}

Five, Equation zero generates 48 SM fermions, see http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2012/04/48-exact-number-for-number-of.html

Six, the manifestation of ‘immutability’: via Ghost-rascal, see  http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2014/02/ghost-rascal-conjecture-and-ultimate.html . Again, it generates 48 SM fermions.

Seven, the manifestation as force(s):

F (unified) = K*ħ/ (delta S*delta T), K is a coefficient constant … Equation one

This force (gravity) has two parts:

First, it moves the entire universe from {[here (now), now] to [here (next), next]}, and it causes the expansion of universe with acceleration.

Second, every individual particle interact with ALL particles in this universe via the {Real/Ghost symmetry}, with the strength measured with Newton’s gravity equation (distance is measured in the world (real) sheet).

See http://www.prequark.org/Gravity.htm

This physics-TOE has the following consequences:

Consequence one: universe expands with acceleration. See, http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2013/11/why-does-dark-energy-make-universe.html

Consequence two: uncertainty principle is the emergent of Equation one.

Consequence three: calculation of Alpha

See https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/totally-blind-deaf-googlefacebookblogosphere-era-jeh-tween-gong

Consequence four: calculation of Planck CMB data

See, https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2015/04/22/dark-energydark-mass-the-silent-truth/

Consequence five: calculation of Cosmology constant, see https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/04/24/entropy-quantum-gravity-cosmology-constant/

Consequence six: the Hierarchy problem

See https://medium.com/@Tienzen/why-making-something-easy-so-difficult-aae8e3715b6d#.6ko3u5dlf

Consequence seven: the physics-TOE,

See https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/01/18/the-final-toe-theory-of-everything/

Section three: life-TOE

The highest EXPRESSION for life is {intelligence and consciousness}.

One, definition of ‘intelligence’:

Necessary condition: there is a ‘counting’ device (counting strews, abacus or Turing computer).

Sufficient condition: the ability to distinguish self from others.

See http://www.prequark.org/Biolife.htm

Two, definition of ‘consciousness’:

Necessary condition: the ability to distinguish self from others.

Sufficient condition: there is a ‘counting’ device (counting strews, abacus or Turing computer).

More about this ‘Theorem of Consciousness’, see Metaphysics of Linguistics, http://www.chinese-word-roots.org/cwr018.htm .

Now, intelligence and consciousness are SEEDed in physics. Yet, the utmost EXPRESSION of life has a structure as a topological torus, having 7 color-codes.

With embedded intelligence and consciousness, life evolves INTELLIGENTly, see DEATHS OF TWO GODS,https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/04/20/deaths-of-two-gods/ and, INTELLIGENT EVOLUTION,https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2014/10/11/intelligent-evolution/ .

With {intelligent evolution}, life-TOE is complete, and it unifies with the physics-TOE.

Section four: the math-TOE

There are three key points for the current mainstream math:

One, number line has the cardinality of continuum; that is, between any {two points}, there are ‘infinite’ numbers between them.

Two, there is ONE ‘number’ for each ‘point’ of the number line.

Three, Continuum Hypothesis is undecidable.

On the other hand, this math-TOE must have the followings:

One, number line has the cardinality of continuum; that is, between any {two points}, there are ‘infinite’ numbers between them.

Two, there are at least ‘TWO’ numbers for each ‘point’ of the number line. This is the key for the math-TOE.

Three, Continuum Hypothesis is false. I will not prove it here in a traditional way but will give an example (the bridge between two cardinalities).

First, we should renormalize the Godel’s incompleteness to regain the completeness in TOTALITY, seehttp://www.prequark.org/Create.htm . More detailed discussion is available at http://www.prebabel.info/lifesys.htm, completeness is regained in life-system via a renormalization process.

See http://www.prebabel.info/lifesys.htm

Second, there are at least two NUMBERs in each number-line POINT.

In the above graph, the ‘X’ point is the point A = 0. The point B is a moving point. When B moves to ‘X’, B = 12. That is, the point ‘X’ in fact has two numbers (0, 12).

Third, Continuum Hypothesis is false; there is a bridge between two infinities.

See http://www.prebabel.info/newmath.htm

Fourth, more entanglement:

One: 1/3 = 1/2 – 1/4 + 1/8 – 1/16 + 1/32 – 1/64 + 1/128 – 1/256 + 1/512 – 1/1024 + 1/2048 -… +…

For 1/3 (with an odd number as the denominator), it can only be “reached” with the sum of a sequence of numbers with only the even numbers as the denominators, see http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2011/05/source-of-spontaneous-symmetry-breaking_13.html and http://www.prebabel.info/newmath.htm

Two: prime numbers cannot be reached via multiplication with nature numbers.

Three, Fermat’s last theorem: the sum of two nature number cannot be reached via the same algebra operation.

Each point (number) is in fact entangled with (or reachable by/from) infinite number of other numbers. For example, 3 is linked to 1/3, {3^n, integers}, {3 ^ (-n), irrational}, etc.

This ‘number entanglement’ is the base for the third cardinality.

Fifth, the ‘HOLE’ point contains infinite number of geometrical points.

See http://www.prequark.org/Create.htm

With the above, we can reconstruct the NUMBER line as follow:

One, with the “number entanglement’, there are three cardinalities: countable, uncountable, the bridge (pseudo-uncountable).

Two, there are three ‘zeros’, in correspondence to the three infinities.

0 (c) = 1/countable

0 (u) = 1/uncountable

0 (p) = 1/pseudo-uncountable

Three, every POINT on the number line has three different NUMBERS.

4 + 0 (c) = C4

4 + 0 (u) = U4

4 + 0 (p) = P4

Yet, these three different ‘4’ cannot be distinguished algebraically or by any known math operations. That is, for some numbers A < > (not the same as) B, {A – B = 0}.

Now, there are two theorems:

Theorem 1: between two ‘points’ of number line, there are infinite ‘numbers’.

Theorem 2: between two ‘numbers’, there could have either infinite or finite numbers.

Four, this ‘number entanglement’ does show up by having three different kind of numbers:

First, with countable digits, such as 3 = 3.0000… (the c-number).

Second, with uncountable digits, such as Pi = 3.14… (the u-number)

Third, with pseudo-uncountable digits, such as 2 ^(1/2) = 1.414… (the p-number)

Five, with a seed number {1}, we can construct the entire number line (including three infinities) with a 7-color code system.

See http://www.prequark.org/Fermat.htm

Section five: The map of Final TOE

I have constructed the physics-TOE from the first principle together with two manifested equations, as below.

The first principle: {The essence of THIS universe is ‘NOTHINGNESS’, and it must remain to be nothingness}; definition of ‘nothingness’: {timelessness and immutability}

{Delta S = (i^n1, i^n2, i^n3) x C x Delta T} … Equation zero

F (unified) = K*ħ/ (delta S*delta T), K is a coefficient constant … Equation one

At this point, there is seemingly a major difference between math and physics.

Physics manifests IN time/space (the equation zero), and thus it is constrained in Energy (an expression of space/time). Thus, physics universe is a FINITUDE.

On the other hand, math manifests IN nothingness {the union of zero(s) and infinities)}.

Thus, the evolution of math has no physical constrain and can have infinite expressions while physics universe is unique (no multiverse). The physics-multiverse is denounced at here,http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2013/10/multiverse-bubbles-are-now-all-burst-by.html

While math evolution can lead to multi-math-universe (arbitrary constructions, such as the Grassman, Quaternion and Octonions numbers), its BASE (the basic lego pieces) is totally NATURE (total Platonism: basic math lego pieces are timeless entities, independent of the physical world and of the symbols used to represent them.) while the human-math is all about the ‘construction’ of ‘structures’.

As the Continuum Hypothesis is undecidable in the set theory, it is valid to select a third cardinality as a new axiom. But, no. This third cardinality is not a humanly selected axiom but is a part of nature’s math basic lego pieces. The reason for the insistence of this is that it is the only way to DERIVE the physics universe from math-universe.

By knowing the difference between the two, the only way to DERIVE the physics universe from math-universe is by transforming infinities into FINITUDE (same as creating something from nothing).

In math universe, the finite numbers are produced by the INVERSE operation of infinities. Yet, transforming infinites into physics-universe (a finitude), they (infinities) must be transformed into CONCRETE objects. And, this was done with two Platonic equations.

One: 1/3 = 1/2 – 1/4 + 1/8 – 1/16 + 1/32 – 1/64 + 1/128 – 1/256 + 1/512 – 1/1024 + 1/2048 -… +…  (trisecting an angle, taking countable steps); countable infinity is now transformed into a concrete object (A: angultron, a trisected angle)

Two: pi / 4 = 1 – 1/3 + 1/5 – 1/7 + 1/9 – 1/11 + 1/13 – … + … (with “countable” infinite steps to reach ‘uncountable digits’); uncountable infinity is now transformed into a unit circle (which gives rise to space/time equation zero; the 64 subspaces: 48 fermions and 16 dark energy).

See, http://www.prebabel.info/newmath.htm ,

http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2011/05/source-of-spontaneous-symmetry-breaking_13.html   and

http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2011/05/source-of-spontaneous-symmetry-breaking_11.html

That is, the math-universe (infinities) gives rise to the physics-universe. Of course, I will give more evidences to show this point.

One, the generalization of a circle is elliptic curve, and the fermion is described with elliptic curve.

See https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/03/16/nothingness-vs-nothing-there-the-quantum-gravity/ .

Two, In addition to this {infinite to finitude} transformation, the key essence of these two equations is the {number entanglement: odd numbers can only be reached by even numbers, and vice versa}. This number entanglement is also the source for quantum (gravity) entanglement.

The essence of the math-universe to physics-universe transformation is all about infinities and the pathways of their concretization. That is, the key equation is,

A – b = 0, but A is not b.

This means that most of numbers are unreachable by finite means (arithmetic and algebra operations), as every *finite* number is the concretization of infinities, and it does carry a tail with infinite digits. That is, for any selected number *A*, it is surrounded by zillions (at least two) neighborhood numbers which are not distinguishable from the number *A* by all means. Thus, all those unreachable (indistinguishable from the number *A*) numbers must be color-coded, such as, b = A (red), = A (blue) or = A (green), etc.; that is, A (x) – b = 0.

Yet, there is always a number C, and

A – C > 0

The largest C cannot truly be determined with finite means. But, in principle, there is always *a* largest C in the physical universe *with* finite means (by measurement). That is,

A – C = g

Although we do not know the exact value for g, g is larger than 0 (g > 0). In the math universe, g is un-determined and can approach the concept of *continuity*. Yet, in the finite (physical) universe, this g becomes the smallest *deterministic unit*, distinguishing the number *C* from the number *A*. Indeed, for the *physical* universe, the g can actually be determined. Let,

X-axis as space, thus, the (delta S > =g).

Y-axis as momentum, the (delta P >= g).

So, (delta P) x (delta S) >= g^2

In physics, the photon is the medium for causality (see Constants of Nature, http://www.prequark.org/Constant.htm). Thus, the smallest *deterministic* unit (for causality) in the physical universe is (photon / c), c is the light speed.  That is, in the physical universe, g^2 = (photon / c).

Yet, photon is the result of the interaction of e (electron).

So, g^2 = (photon /c) = (e^2/c), e is electric charge.

In the article “The Rise of Gravity and Electric Charge, (http://www.prequark.org/Gravity.htm )”, the e-charge is,

e (charge) = (L * C)^(1/2) = [(1/2) ħ * C]^(1/2); L the angular momentum, C light speed, ħ (Planck constant).

So, g^2 = ħ * C / C = ħ,

Thus, (delta P) x (delta S) > = g^2 >= ħ

Now, the uncertainty principle of physics is the direct consequence of the *Nature math*, the essence of infinities and of unreachable of numbers (the number entanglement), see http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2013/10/multiverse-bubbles-are-now-all-burst-by.html

With this *derivation*, this new paradigm is fully verified. Yet, there is one very important additional point. That is, this major essence of the *unreachable numbers* is swept away in the human math by the concept of *continuity*. That is, the human math is completely unaware of this *Nature math*.

Three, this {number entanglement} is also the source for Fermat’s last theorem and abc-conjecture, and they are closely related to the elliptic curves. Fermat’s Last Theorem was proved by using elliptic curves but still not knowing the essence of the theorem: the entanglement caused by the colored numbers. In fact, this colored number is the SOURCE for the Fermat’s last theorem, see The Philosophical Meanings of Fermat’s Last Theorem,http://www.prequark.org/Fermat.htm .

Four, topologically a complex elliptic curve is a torus (can be defined with 7 color-codes) which is the BASE for consciousness via the Theorem of consciousness (Ringel-Youngs theorem).

Section six: conclusion

One: Physics TOE

First principle: {The essence of THIS universe is ‘NOTHINGNESS’, and it must remain to be nothingness}; definition of ‘nothingness’: {timelessness and immutability}

Consequences:

First, Nature constants: Cosmology constant (https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/04/24/entropy-quantum-gravity-cosmology-constant/ ), Alpha = (1/137.03599…), etc.

Second, Planck CMB data (DE=69.22 % 、D=25.90 % 、V=4.86 %)

Third, expanding universe with acceleration

Fourth, SM fermion zoo

See, http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2013/11/why-does-dark-energy-make-universe.html ,https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2015/04/22/dark-energydark-mass-the-silent-truth/ andhttp://prebabel.blogspot.com/2012/04/alpha-fine-structure-constant-mystery.html

Two: Math-TOE — First principle in math as {nothingness = 1/infinit(ies)}

Consequences:

First, {colored number/number entanglement: 0 (c) = 1/countable; 0 (u) = 1/uncountable; 0 (p) = 1/pseudo-uncountable} with 7 colors {1, c-numbers, p-numbers, u-numbers, countable, uncountable, pseudo-uncountable}.

Second, Fermat’s last theorem, ABC conjecture, etc.

Third, describing physics TOE

Fourth, as a base for life TOE

Math-universe is built up with arbitrary constructions by using a “lego base”, but this {Lego Base} is not a construction but is totally nature, expressed from the {First Principle} which gives rise to physics-universe too.

Three: Life TOE — Intelligence + Consciousness

First, definition of ‘intelligence’:

Necessary condition: there is a ‘counting’ device (counting strews, abacus or Turing computer).

Sufficient condition: the ability to distinguish self from others.

Second, definition of ‘consciousness’:

Necessary condition: the ability to distinguish self from others.

Sufficient condition: there is a ‘counting’ device (counting strews, abacus or Turing computer).

See http://www.prequark.org/Biolife.htm

Four, on a deeper level, physics TOE is derived from math by concretizing infinities.

Five, physics/math/life are totally unified.

See http://www.prequark.org/Create.htm

See http://www.prequark.org/Create.htm

Note 1: in 2014, Max Tegmark published a book “Our Mathematical Universe” which promotes an idea of {the mathematical universe hypothesis (MUH)} with the central point as: {Our external physical reality is a mathematical structure. That is, the physical universe is mathematics in a well-defined sense, and “in those [worlds] complex enough to contain self-aware substructures [they] will subjectively perceive themselves as existing in a physically ‘real’ world”.} His key idea is similar to mine but with the following giant differences.

One, Tegmark does not and did not know any physics-TOE; so, his idea is just a philosophy, no way to unify physics and math.

Two, this math-TOE is totally based on the colored numbers (the third cardinality) and the number entanglement, and Tegmark does not have any idea of these.

Three, Tegmark reached his conclusion for multiverse from two confusions:

First, (1/Alpha) is not computable, at least not in countable steps, and this is absolutely wrong.

Second, that there are unlimited (if not infinite) math-structures in comparison to a unique physical universe. In my math-TOE, math and physics have the same BASE lego set while physics manifests in the arrow of time (being constrained by energy) while math manifests in the essence of nature (the timelessness). The multiverse bullcrap is denounced in the article {Multiverse bubbles are now all burst by the math of Nature,http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2013/10/multiverse-bubbles-are-now-all-burst-by.html }.

Note 2: this article is written as a part of presentation {(Modeling universe by G-string theory) at “Strings 2016 (http://ymsc.tsinghua.edu.cn:8090/strings/ )” held at Tsinghua University, Beijing China (from August 1 to 5, 2016)} and will be handed out as handout at {The 7th International Congress of Chinese Mathematicians (ICCM 2016),  held from Aug. 6 to Aug. 11, 2016 in Beijing} by my colleague Dr. Li xiaojian (Professor of North China University of Technology, Beijing, 100144, China).

一、定义真正的悖论和错误的悖论：
任何真正的悖论（g-paradox），它必须有两个事实，并导致出矛盾的结果。
每一真正的悖论（如，自体同源的悖论，康托悖论，如罗素悖论等）可以以两种方式解决。
第一，必须有更高的对称性，才能统一矛盾的双方。
第二，可以通过进一步的对称性破缺消除矛盾。
然而，对于一个错误的悖论，它是用下面的方式定义的：
错误的悖论=总和（事实（i））+ 总和（错误（i））
例如：黑洞信息悖论=爱丽丝/鲍勃悖论：

N=错误次数求和 {错误的悖论（i），i-physcists =1，2，3，4。。。}

I   一段简史
有了这个定义，我们现在可以回顾{爱丽丝／鲍勃（黑洞信息）佯谬}。
首先，有一些事实：
一、根据GR（广义相对论），有些恒星（大约3倍太阳的质量，3米☉（托尔曼–奥本海默–沃尔科夫限制））崩溃的恒星黑洞会在一个区域，甚至光都无法摆脱或逃避其强大的引力，因此有事件视界，或具有史瓦西半径。
二、这个恒星黑洞应该是“无毛”，也就是说，只有三个宏观参数（质量，电荷，角动量）没有任何其他变量（毛）。
以上这些事实，没有矛盾。这样的恒星黑洞是一颗曾经活着的恒星的埋葬地，而恒星的所有量子信息作为一个恒星遗骨都被埋葬了，但并没有丢失。
然而，有I = 1（Stephen Hawking），他提出以下声称。
第一：黑洞是一个黑色的物体，因此，它应该有黑体热辐射（光子）。
第二：黑洞的热辐射会导致黑洞最终的总蒸发。
第三：这种热辐射不是任何恒星遗骨（信息）的载体。
因此，结论是，当这个恒星坟场（黑洞）被完全蒸发时，应该有恒星遗骨存在！这个恒星遗骨莫名其妙地消失了，恒星遗骨不是由热辐射或光子传出被蒸发掉了。所以，恒星遗骨丢失了就是黑洞信息丢失了。但是，这个结论与量子力学定律是矛盾的，因此构成黑洞信息悖论。
现在，我们有第一个版本的“黑洞信息”悖论。

然后，i= 2（李奥纳特•苏士侃和Larus Thorlacius，和其他一些人），他们提出了以下要求。
第一，新的蒸发过程是在黑洞视界附近不断产生的虚粒子对：爱丽丝和鲍伯，而不是热光子。其中一个爱丽丝掉进黑洞，而鲍伯逃逸。
第二，逃逸的鲍勃最终会导致黑洞的全部蒸发。
第三，由于爱丽丝和鲍伯是纠缠的双胞胎（只有不同的性别），爱丽丝的所有信息都可以从鲍伯那里得到。
结论：虽然黑洞蒸发掉了一切，包括爱丽丝的遗骨也永远消失了，但她的灵魂在她的孪生兄弟鲍伯身上被量子纠缠所保存。所以，没有黑洞信息丢失的悖论。

于是，有了有第二个版本的“黑洞信息”悖论。
没完，还有i= 3（Ahmed Almheiri，Donald Marolf，Joseph Polchinski，和James Sully），他们宣称。
第一，爱丽丝没有被白白地杀死，因为她在最后一口气（当然是按照GR定律）吐出一点蓝光，而那小小的蓝光使黑洞的视界变的更蓝了。
第二，经过足够的（在大约一半的黑洞蒸发）蓝光积累，事件视界成为任何新的下落的爱丽丝谁将油炸和永远无法进入黑洞防火墙。也就是说，在所有的实际意义上，这个洞已经消失了（没有东西能掉进去）。
问题：联合蒸发的半黑洞还存在吗？没有任何证据判别！
如果它还在那里，它还会从这一点一点地蒸发掉吗？
如果它不停地蒸发，最后，剩下的遗骨会发生什么？由于防火墙封闭的修补方案不能挽救黑洞继续蒸发，那么，剩下的遗骨是否也都丢失了呢？
我们有第三个版本的“黑洞信息”悖论。

嗯，演出必须继续下去。所以，i= 4（Stephen Hawking，Andrew Strominger，Malcolm J. Perry）。当然，所有这些错误的最简单的方法就是谴责“无毛发”定理。所以，他们现在宣称所有的黑洞都有‘毛’。
但是，但是，但是，其刚刚宣布它观察到的“引力波”是由两个黑洞碰撞产生的。然而，在计算中（从观察到的引力波来看），这两个碰撞的黑洞没有“毛发”。此外，霍金的阻塞毛发的数量可能不足以携带所有的死亡骨架。
对于任何一个恒星黑洞来说，它实际上并没有任何实际意义上的霍金热辐射，因为黑洞的表观温度比周围的温度要冷得多（大约2.7欧凯文）。也就是说，一个恒星黑洞不会向外辐射，而是吸收周围环境的热辐射。由超新星过程形成的恒星黑洞不会蒸发到现在或在可预见的将来（至少是宇宙的两倍）。
那么，为什么“黑洞信息”悖论还在继续呢？

嗯，可能有一些原始黑洞（大爆炸的结果，不是超新星过程的结果），它们有更小的质量。黑洞的温度与它的质量成反比。要使黑洞的温度大于2.7 K（并且能够蒸发），它需要比Moon少的质量，这样一个黑洞的直径将小于第十毫米，现在它可以蒸发。在最后一个蒸发阶段，一个原始黑洞会发出伽马射线，这应该是可以探测到的。对这种闪光的搜索已证明是不成功的，并对存在低质量原始黑洞的可能性提出了严格的限制。然而，NASA在2008发射的费米伽马射线太空望远镜将继续搜寻这些闪光。

如果原始黑洞的前景不太好，为什么这个“黑洞信息”悖论还在继续呢？
根据M理论，应该有一些微型原始黑洞。对于一个质量1 TeV／C2的黑洞，大型强子对撞机（I）它可以检测到。但是，迄今为止还没有发现这样的微小黑洞，包括迄今为止的LHC（II）数据。
再说一遍，为什么这个毫无道理的黑洞信息悖论还在继续？

他们说：在上述历史上有一些重大的发现。
发现一种新的熵：
霍金在一般情况下表明，任何一系列经典黑洞视界的总面积不会永远减少，即使它们碰撞合并。这就成为黑洞力学的第二定律，与热力学第二定律极为相似。以质量作为能量，表面重力为温度，面积为熵，有一种新的熵。

这是一个黑洞的Bekenstein––霍金熵（S），这取决于黑洞的面积（A），光速常数（C），玻尔兹曼常数（K），牛顿常数（G），和约化普朗克常数（ħ）。
在经典熵中，黑洞应该具有近零熵。但这种新型的熵，Bekenstein认为黑洞是最大熵的物体，他们有比相同体积的东西更多的熵。
其二，这个新的熵，热拉尔’t Hooft和李奥纳特•苏士侃发现了全息原理，这表明任何一个时空发生的过程可以通过对该时空的边界数据描述。
其三、与全息原理，Juan Maldacena在1997发现的AdS/CFT对应性。这个AdS/CFT成为M理论问题的大救星。
今天，这个AdS/ CFT对应性是主流物理学的超越标准模型物理唯一有效的方法。

II：详细审查

以上是近40年来现代物理学的简史。这段历史能带来美好的未来吗？或者，这是完全错误的吗？
如果我们没有一个与上述错误的不同的道路，我们就没有权利说它错了。如果我们的途径不正确，我就没有权利去说别人的错误。

我们可以简单地比较：谁能得到所有的自然常数（Cabibbo角/温伯格，Alpha，宇宙学常数，等）和普朗克CMB数据？
（主流）历史上没有人可以，但龚学可以。
Paul Steinhardt’s remorse, Popperianism and Beauty-Contest
有了这些的比较，谁对谁错就很显然了：也就不再有关于科学方法论的争论了。现在，我们有权直言不讳：这种“黑洞信息悖论”的历史完全走错了道路。

Note: Stephen Hawking conceded for stirring up this ‘dead-skeleton lost’- paradox at this point.
在显示正确的路径之前，必须先指出上面历史上的一些错误。

错误一：霍金辐射都是关于热光子的，热光子无静止质量，说辐射带走质量实际上毫无意义。
错误二：黑洞不会演出爱丽丝与鲍勃消失戏剧。在任何黑洞的物理学原理中，鲍伯和爱丽丝是由真空能产生的粒子对，没有任何原理只让鲍勃逃脱而爱丽丝留下。在这个爱丽丝/鲍勃的戏剧中，即使是用黑洞的能量来支付鲍勃的逃跑，也没有任何一种物理定律要求爱丽丝必须始终携带负能量。没有任何原理让黑洞的“质量”减少，也就是说，鲍伯的逃脱不会从黑洞中带走任何质量。爱丽丝是一个粒子（不仅仅是光子），她也携带一些静止的质量。所以，如果爱丽丝不给黑洞提供更多的质量，这个爱丽丝/鲍勃的戏剧至少也不会引起黑洞的蒸发。
错误三：如果黑洞蒸发，其最终的史瓦西半径将变为零，其熵的区域将成为零。也就是说，霍金的黑洞面积定律是错误的。

正确的道路只有一个问题：什么是重力？
重力很简单，它可以把百事可乐（坐在我休息的桌子上）从{这里，现在]转到[这里，下一个] }。而且，它需要一个力F（重力）来完成它。
F（重力）= K *ħ/（ΔS×Δt），k是一个常数。
然后，量子原理从这个F（重力）中出现。当然，我们可以对重力做更详细的定义，如下所示。
第一，重力必须基于粒子物理学，因为只有粒子携带质量（重力的唯一参数）。牛顿引力和广义相对论与粒子物理学无关，因此它们是错误的引力理论。seehttps://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2016/03/16/nothingness-vs-nothing-there-the-quantum-gravity/
第二，用牛顿引力方程描述了任意两物体间的万有引力（2）。
第三，重力必须 瞬时 和 同时 作用 （在这个宇宙中的所有粒子）。重力绝对不会以光速传播，尽管重力波（重力的属性）是。万有引力不是“局部的”。但是，我坐在桌子上的百事可乐罐的重力是：
F（百事重力）=Gm{求和[M（i）/ R（i）^ 2 ] } …..A方程
i代表整个宇宙的粒子，除了百事可乐。m是百事可乐的质量。

百事可乐可就放在我的桌子上（世界床单上的一块地）静止休息，它（百事可乐罐）与宇宙中所有其他粒子相互作用。{这是由两个部分组成的：世界表（真宇宙）和鬼点}。也就是说，百事可乐可以通过两条途径与宇宙的所有其他粒子联系在一起：
在物质世界中，它与其他粒子之间的距离是r（i）＞0。因此，用牛顿重力方程计算了它们之间的引力相互作用强度。
因为，它（百事可乐）通过幽灵点与所有其他粒子相连，它与所有其他粒子之间的距离为所有“i”的R（I）＝{普朗克长度}。
因此，百事可乐的重力强度可以用A方程来计算。
重力传输的时间是{普朗克时间}，几乎是瞬时的。
当一个物体的重力（比如百事可乐）的重力是用A方程式计算出来的，重力传输是通过“普朗克时间”，重力的真正定义是它把整个宇宙从现在移动到下一个}。参见， HTTP：/ / www.prequark.org /gravity.htm 详情。

III：悖论不再！

现在，我们可以通过两种途径来解决“黑洞信息”悖论问题。
一、宇宙自诞生以来的每一点信息（大爆炸）都是用一个详细的簿记记录的，宇宙学常数（cc）。通过比较计算CC和测量，我们将知道是否有任何信息丢失。我的计算表明，没有信息丢失，看到 https: / / tienzengong.WordPress.COM / 2016 / 04 / 24 /熵量子引力宇宙学常数/ 。
两个黑洞不是通过爱丽丝/鲍勃戏剧形成的。这个“边缘”戏剧怎么能深入到黑洞的本质？只有知道黑洞是如何形成的，我们才能讨论黑洞最终的死亡（如果有的话）。
总的来说，我们说当物体的内部压强不足以抵抗物体自身的引力时，就会发生重力坍缩。这种说法没有错误，但却是误导性的，而且确实误导了。

它的内部压力是多少？
它自身的引力是什么？
我将用两个概念来澄清这些问题。
一，{自由粒子}：
其内部的压力是什么？
什么是其自身的重力？
我想有两个清晰的概念基础。
一个粒子，{自由粒子}：
以我们的太阳为例：整个空间（一箱）一个给定的原子（氢原子等），在它的一生中被作为一个roamed自由粒子（一个原子箱）。这个自由的粒子（盒）可能是一个在其面立方体100英里，它包含数十亿原子。为每一个粒子（无盒），它可以作为一个粒子（静止不动）。
定义：如果一个净力为零的粒子，这是一个自由的粒子。
这是a {自由}，粒子在其余条件总是在盒子的盒子），AS是不接收任何外部的力和力不出任何项目。
定理：一个粒子在一个紧凑的对象A，它是一个自由的粒子
corollary：水分子在一个冰格是一个自由的粒子。
因此，中子在中子星A A是一个自由的粒子。
二，潮汐力：
一杆（或箱）有一英尺长（RA，RB，[米] = 1），有一个在潮汐力杆（或盒（箱）），如果它不是一个自由粒子一紧凑的对象（源的潮汐重力）
潮汐力（a，b）= f（r）-（的R – 1）= f（a，b）的TF
在A和B是重力为：
f（a）= F（R，R）是一个长途的中心点，填充的对象。
f（b）= f（r + 1），不要一米远离中心。
如果重力潮汐力一紧凑的对象在一个盒（a，b），小（的）结构的结合力比盒子（氢原子），它可以形成恒星，它无法通过原子分开。
如果重力潮汐力一紧凑的对象在一个盒（a，b）较大（＞）的结合力比结构盒子（氢原子）的原子将被终止，然后分开。本案例中，它可能变成一个中子星。
当重力潮汐力在一箱一紧凑的对象（中子）是更大的比（＞）结构结合力（中子，中子和拉除了它变成黑洞。当然，我们没有去成黑洞是通过中子星的舞台。
因此，基本上，这是，至少，三类型的恒星。
一，“质子星”（PS）：星状如我们的太阳是由99.99%的氢原子（含质子）”
二，“中子星（NS）
三、“黑洞（BH）
质子星主要是由质子（氢原子）构成。太阳的潮汐力是不足以大的分开氢原子的。然而，核融合产生足够的热能量平衡对太阳的引力。因此，它有一个大的直径。
它的崩塌，有几个途径。
结果I型超新星的白矮星的明星：a，a：碳融合的支持7000km半径（约是地球的大小）。然而，它仍然是一个质子的明星。
结果II型超新星：当足够大的潮汐力是分手的氢或氦原子的中子星，它崩塌collapses作为一个平均半径（1到10英里），一个小城市的大小。所有原子的质子是从中间隔断，和没有人可以活下去。
如果潮汐力是足够强的分手的“中子”，成为“IT黑洞的史瓦西半径约10英里’for a 3太阳质量的黑洞。把所有强子的粒子是分开的。
两个Schwarzschild黑洞的描述，有一个奇点在Schwarzschild球面中心。但是，在这个环的G弦的描述，每个字符串是一个“奇点”的准备，没有奇点，在中心的地方。
三串，每个环是一个自由的粒子内部的黑洞。这是更长的时间，没有任何自由落体或潮汐重力在这个环的字符串时，它的事件视界的护照。
四，事件视界是本面条化spaghettification innermost圈区。
因此，“量子引力”是一个关于重力之间的中子在中子星？
重力是整个宇宙的一个动作力这是量子单位，参见：http：/ /  prebabel.blogspot.com /2013-11 -为什么是黑暗能量的补充性原则universe.html 量子重力。
再次，每一个粒子在紧凑的对象（A固体球，明星等）是一个自由的粒子。
因此，粒子在重力作用下紧凑对象互相相等，equals对象的所有粒子是按照光盘的Freundlich方程。
中子在中子星的中心湖与中子在中子星边缘具有一样的重力。

当g-quark /轻子弦（线）卷曲成环的字符串，夸克的色荷和代中和（不破坏）。所以，当一个粒子（中子，质子，电子或其他）落入黑洞，它成为一个环串，所有的电荷中和而保守。当它们被辐射出去以后（如果有的话），环重新拉直以恢复它们的电荷。也就是说，没有信息丢失，也没有获得。

这是龚弦的描述和经典之间的差异。
一，而不是与史瓦西半径视界，有一个面条拉伸（spaghettification）区。当一个粒子（或其他）是面条拉伸spaghettified，它分解成g-ring-strings。
二，黑洞的史瓦西描述在史瓦西球中心的一个“奇点”。但是，在这个龚学描述，每一环的龚弦本身是一个“奇点”，并没有在任何地方出现任何奇异的中心。
三，每个环串是黑洞内部的一个自由粒子。也就是说，当这个环弦穿过事件视界时不再有自由落体或潮汐重力。
四，事件视界是面条拉伸spaghettification区核心圈。
所以，“量子引力”并不是中子星中中子之间的引力。
重力是整个宇宙的量子单位产生的力！参见http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2013/11/why-does-dark-energy-make-universe.html，量子原理是重力的显现。

同样，致密物体（实心球、恒星等）中的每一个粒子都是自由粒子。
因此，在一个紧凑的物体中的粒子的重力等于根据这个方程A在这个致密物体中的所有粒子。中子星中心的中子与中子在边缘的引力相同。
IV：结论
这个信息悖论问题有两种解决方法。
一、簿记、宇宙学常数的计算。
二、是黑洞的内部结构，所有的环弦仍然带有质量和电荷，但所有其他信息都被储存起来。

最后，全息原理是宇宙物理运动（从现在（t1）到下一个（T2））产生的直接结果。

原文见附：